Frugal Finance

Paul Hall Paul Hall

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Übungsfragen: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager & ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dateien Prüfungsunterlagen

Sie können nur die Fragen und Antworten zur PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager) Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert als Simulationsprüfung benutzen, dann können Sie einfach die Prüfung bestehen. Mit dem PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertfikat steht Ihr professionelles Niveau höher als das der anderen. Sie bekommen deshalb große Beförderungschance. Fügen Sie PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Fragen Und Antworten von ITZert in den Warenkorb hinzu. ITZert bietet Ihnen rund um die Uhr Online-Service.

ITZert ist eine Website voller Zuversicht. Die IT-Profis von ITZert widmen sich der Studie der vielfältigen IT-Zertifizierungsprüfungen, um die Effektivität der Erfolg der PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfungen zu verbessern. Solange Sie einmal ITZert Unterlagen probieren, wollen Sie unbedingt sie wieder benutzen, weil wir ITZert nicht nur Ihnen die besten PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsunterlagen, sondern auch den besten Service anbieten. Wenn Sie irgendwelche Meinungen haben, senden Sie bitte ihre Vorschläge an uns per E-Mail. Wir hoffen, wir helfen Kadidaten Erfolg machen und auch bieten den besten Service.

>> ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Lerntipps <<

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Deutsche Prüfungsfragen, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Simulationsfragen

ITZert bietet eine klare und ausgezeichnete Lösung für jeden PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Prüfungskandidaten. Wir versorgen Sie mit den ausführlichen PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Prüfungsfragen und Antworten. Unser Team von IT-Experten ist das erfahrenste und qualifizierteste. Unsere Testfragen und Antworten sind fast gelich wie die echte Prüfung. Das ist wirklich großartig. Am wichtigsten ist, dass die Erfolgsquote von ITZert die höchste in der Welt ist.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q58-Q63):

58. Frage
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Based on scenario 2, the team decided to involve interested parties in risk management activities. Is this a good practice?

A. No, only the risk management team should be involved in risk management activities
B. Yes, relevant interested parties should be involved in risk management activities to ensure the successful completion of the risk assessment
C. No. only internal interested parties should be involved in risk management activities

Antwort: B

Begründung:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, involving relevant interested parties in the risk management process is considered a best practice. This approach ensures that all perspectives are considered, and relevant knowledge is leveraged, which helps in comprehensively identifying, analyzing, and managing risks. Interested parties, such as stakeholders, can provide valuable insights and information regarding the organization's assets, processes, threats, and vulnerabilities, contributing to a more accurate and effective risk assessment. Therefore, option B is correct because it supports the principle that involving relevant parties leads to a more successful risk assessment process. Options A and C are incorrect because excluding either external interested parties or restricting involvement only to the risk management team would limit the effectiveness of the risk management process.

59. Frage
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
How should Detika define which of the identified risks should be treated first? Refer to scenario 5.

A. Based on their priority in the risk treatment plan
B. Based on the resources required for ensuring effective implementation
C. Based on who is accountable and responsible for approving the risk treatment plan

Antwort: A

Begründung:
Detika should prioritize the treatment of identified risks based on their priority in the risk treatment plan. According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk treatment plan specifies the order in which risks should be treated based on their severity, likelihood, and impact on the organization. Risks that pose the greatest threat to the organization or have the highest priority should be treated first. Options B and C are incorrect because allocating resources or determining accountability do not inherently establish the priority of risk treatment; the risk treatment plan does.

60. Frage
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Based on scenario 3, what does the complicated user interface of the software which could lead to error present?

A. A threat
B. A vulnerability
C. An asset

Antwort: B

Begründung:
ISO/IEC 27005 defines a vulnerability as a weakness in an asset or control that could potentially be exploited by one or more threats. In the scenario, the complicated user interface of the payment software represents a weakness that could lead to user errors, potentially impacting data integrity and confidentiality. This aligns with the definition of a vulnerability, as it is a weakness that could be exploited by threats (e.g., errors in use). Therefore, the complicated user interface is correctly identified as a vulnerability, making option A the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.3, "Risk Identification," where vulnerabilities are identified as weaknesses that can be exploited by threats.

61. Frage
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 to determine the necessary controls for treating the risk described in the third risk scenario. According to the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?

A. No, organizations should define custom controls that accurately reflect the selected information security risk treatment options
B. Yes. organizations should select all controls from a chosen control set that are necessary for treating the risks
C. No, Annex A controls should be used as a control set only if the organization seeks compliance to ISO/IEC 27001

Antwort: B

Begründung:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, organizations can use any set of controls to treat identified risks as long as they are appropriate and necessary for managing those risks. Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 provides a comprehensive set of controls that can be used to mitigate various information security risks. In this scenario, Alex reviewed the controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and selected control A.8.23 (Web filtering) to treat the risk associated with phishing and accessing unsecured websites. This approach aligns with ISO/IEC 27005, which allows selecting relevant controls from any set to effectively manage risks. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which allows for selecting controls from a set, such as Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001, to treat risks appropriately.

62. Frage
Which statement regarding risks and opportunities is correct?

A. Risks always have a positive outcome whereas opportunities have an unpredicted outcome
B. Opportunities might have a positive impact, whereas risks might have a negative impact
C. There is no difference between opportunities and risks; these terms can be used interchangeably

Antwort: B

Begründung:
ISO standards, including ISO/IEC 27005, make a distinction between risks and opportunities. Risks are defined as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, which can result in negative consequences (such as financial loss, reputational damage, or operational disruption). Opportunities, on the other hand, are situations or conditions that have the potential to provide a positive impact on achieving objectives. Therefore, option B is correct, as it accurately reflects that risks are generally associated with negative impacts, while opportunities can lead to positive outcomes. Option A is incorrect because risks can have negative outcomes, not positive ones. Option C is incorrect because risks and opportunities have different meanings and implications and are not interchangeable.

63. Frage
......

Mit den Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert würden Sie eine glänzende Zukunft haben und Erfolg erzielen. Sie werden Sie nicht nur zum Erfolg führen, sondern auch Ihre Fähigkeiten in der IT-Branche effizient entfalten. Sie umfassen zahlreiche Wissensgebiete und können Ihre Kenntnisse verbessern. Wenn Sie noch warten oder zögern, denn Sie wissen nicht, wie man die PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen kann, keine Sorge. Die Schulungsunterlagen zur PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert wird alle Ihren Probleme lösen.

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Deutsche Prüfungsfragen: https://www.itzert.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager_valid-braindumps.html

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Lerntipps Aber es basiert auf WEB Browser, Insofern bieten unser hochwertiger ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Prüfungsguide: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Ihnen die notwendige Unterstützung, PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Lerntipps Hier muss ich sagen, dass fast keine andere Lieferanten in dieser Branche so kundenfreundlich sind, den Aktualisierungsdienst für ein ganzes Jahr leisten, Wenn Sie von der aktuellen Arbeit müde sind, gibt unser aktueller Pass PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Guide Ihnen jetzt einen Neustart und ein neues Leben.

Er ging hinaus, um nachzusehen, was los war, Er sagte ihr nur im allgemeinen, daß ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager sich ihm Denner als der verruchteste Bösewicht offenbart, und er daher alle Gemeinschaft mit ihm abgebrochen habe; nie solle er mehr seine Schwelle betreten.

Sie können so einfach wie möglich - ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager bestehen!

Aber es basiert auf WEB Browser, Insofern bieten unser hochwertiger ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Prüfungsguide: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Ihnen die notwendige Unterstützung, Hier muss ich sagen, dass fast keine andere Lieferanten ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Deutsche Prüfungsfragen in dieser Branche so kundenfreundlich sind, den Aktualisierungsdienst für ein ganzes Jahr leisten.

Wenn Sie von der aktuellen Arbeit müde sind, gibt unser aktueller Pass PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Guide Ihnen jetzt einen Neustart und ein neues Leben, Sie können auch im Internet teilweise die Fragen und Antworten zur PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Zertifizierungsprüfung kostenlos herunterladen, so dass Sie die Qualität unserer Produkte testen können.

Paul Hall Paul Hall

Biography

Company

Support